A fisherman speaks to the crowd in Jerusalem, “and about three
thousand were added to their number that day” Acts 2:41. A former
baseball player speaks to the crowds in Boston two thousand years
later and 64,484 more were added. A simple country preacher speaks
and thousands “make decisions” in 1950.
The History of Revivalism in Boston by Rudy
Mitchell reminds us of how the Spirit of God can move across an
entire city setting in motion a wave of transformation. After
reading such accounts from the past, one can’t help but ask God,
“What’s next?”
As always, your feedback is
appreciated.
Brian Corcoran, Managing Editor
Production Note:
This is the first issue we have published in 2007.
Sickness in our staff and some technical slowdowns have caused
us to miss our intended publication schedule. Our plans are to
publish the next edition by the end of March. You can expect a
new copy of the Emmanuel Research Review to reach your
mailbox each month. Thanks for your patience.
Steve Daman, Production Editor
History of Revivalism in
Boston
by Rudy Mitchell
Senior Researcher, Emmanuel Gospel
Center, Boston
Certainly it becomes us, who profess the religion
of Christ, to take notice of such astonishing exercises of his
power and mercy, and give him the glory which is due when he
begins to accomplish any of his promises concerning the latter
days: and it gives us further encouragement to pray, and wait,
and hope for the like display of his power in the midst of us.
—John Guyse and Isaac Watts (Preface to
Jonathan Edward’s A Faithful Narrative of the Surprising Work of
God)
Outline
PART ONE
Revivalism
First Great
Awakening in Boston, 1740
Part Two
The Revivals of 1823-24
and 1826-27
Boston Revival of 1841-42
Part Three
Revival of 1857-58
Dwight L. Moody Revival Meetings, 1870s
Billy Sunday
Revival of 1916-17
Billy Graham Revival of 1950
Bibliography
Revivalism
“Revivalism is the movement that promotes periodic spiritual
intensity in church life, during which the unconverted come to
Christ and the converted are shaken out of their spiritual
lethargy.”1 Revivalism has not been confined to
rural and frontier areas, but has been strongly urban as well.
Boston, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other cities have all
experienced revivalism. While revivalism has sometimes been
characterized as highly emotional, it has had strong rational and
educational elements as well. Preachers like Jonathan Edwards and
Lyman Beecher were serious, rational theological writers. Even the
dramatic and emotional Billy Sunday drew on considerable research
and statistical data in some of his revival sermons. Other
revivalists promoted education and started schools. While God has
often used well-known Christian leaders in evangelism and
revivals, local churches and lay people have also played an
important role. For example, the Prayer Meeting Revival of
1857-1858 was initiated and led largely by laymen.
First Great Awakening in Boston
Prior to the First Great Awakening, there had been considerable
religious interest in Boston on the occasion of the 1727
earthquake. Although a significant number were converted, this
renewed spiritual interest was short-lived. After several years of
declining spiritual life, the pastors were so dissatisfied “that
in the summer of 1734 they agreed to propose another course of
days of prayer and fasting among their several congregations, to
humble themselves before God for their unfruitfulness under the
means of grace, and to ask for the effusion of his Spirit to
revive the power of Godliness among them.”2 In spite of the prayer and fasting
that summer there was no immediate revival in Boston. The pastors
and people were receiving word of the awakening under Jonathan
Edwards in Northampton and western New England. The news caused
people to reflect and to pray that the revival might spread
throughout the country. However, in Boston the lack of piety and
spiritual vitality continued.
In the summer of 1735, Dr. Benjamin Colman of the Brattle
Street Church wrote to Jonathan Edwards and received back a letter
with a report of the Northampton revival. Colman was very
impressed and sent a copy to Rev. Guyse in London.3 The resulting interest eventually
led to the publication of a longer version of the report, titled
A Faithful Narrative of the Surprising Work of God… in
London in October, 1737. By the end of 1738, Boston printers had
already published three editions with a second preface by some of
the Boston ministers.4 This influential publication was
certainly being read with interest in Boston, as well as in the
British Isles. This very important report helped lay the
foundation for the revival in 1740. Mark Noll says:
It was Edwards’s narrative of revival more than the theology he
himself presented as its foundation that most fired the
evangelical imagination. The Faithful Narrative became an
instant classic. It was the exemplary exposition of revival,…
[his] exposition of the preparation, onset, maintenance,
regulation, dangers and effects of revival became normative for
many in his generation and even more in the in the generations
that followed.5
By 1738, some of the Boston pastors had received reports of the
power and success of George Whitefield’s preaching. There was a
general interest among the pastors and people to have Whitefield
come to Boston. Not long after Whitefield came to America, Dr.
Colman sent an invitation asking him to come to Boston. Later,
other ministers, as well as the Secretary of Massachusetts (Mr.
Josiah Willard), had also written to urge him to come.6 Whitefield “came to America just in
time to infuse new energy into the languishing work begun under
Edwards, and to thrust it forward like a flaming torch into all
the colonies.”7
George Whitefield was well known and widely read about before
he arrived in Boston. Printed accounts of his life, ministry and
sermons were best sellers, which paved the way for his effective
evangelistic ministry in Boston. In May 1740, Benjamin Franklin
printed the first volumes of Whitefield’s Journals and Sermons. He
and Whitefield had developed a subscription and distribution
network of merchants and booksellers which included James
Franklin, John Smith, Benjamin Elliot, and Charles Harrison in
Boston. Elliot purchased 250 sets and Harrison received 1,000
volumes.8 The fifteen booksellers in Boston
competed aggressively with each other to sell Whitefield’s books
before, during and after his tour to New England. Some published
their own editions. “In the peak revival year, 1740, Whitefield
wrote or inspired thirty-nine titles, or 30 percent of all works
published in America. …[F]rom 1739 to 1742, one of the largest
publishers in the colonies, Daniel Henchman of Boston, spent more
than 30 percent of his printing budget on producing the
evangelist’s books.”9 News accounts in the Boston
Weekly News-Letter and other sources all contributed to
advance publicity for Whitefield. Rev. Thomas Prince of Boston
noted the influence of all this printed publicity: “Accounts of
the Rev. Mr. Whitefield as they successively arrived
before his appearance here… prepar’d the Way for his Entertainment
and successful Labours among us.”10
On Thursday, September 18, 1740, Whitefield started out at
daybreak from Rhode Island and traveled all day to Boston. Four
miles outside of town, he was met by a welcoming party, which
included the son of the Governor, one or two ministers, and
several other gentlemen. They arrived in Boston at 8:00 in the
evening, and he conducted a time of devotions and prayer for
blessing on his ministry.
The next day, Friday, Sept. 19, he met with Gov. Belcher, who
was moved to tears several times during personal meetings with
Whitefield. Later Whitefield worshipped at King’s Chapel and then
met with the Church of England clergy, who questioned him on his
beliefs. He met with several other ministers, and then was asked
to preach at the Brattle Street Church in the afternoon. Rev.
Prince observed that a crowd of 2,000 or more quickly gathered.
The sermon was from John 17: 2, “As thou hast given him power over
all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou
hast given him.” Whitefield made it clear that education and
morality would not save them, but they must come to know God
personally and experientially in Christ. Thomas Prince observed
that Whitefield spoke “in demonstration of the Spirit and power.
And especially when he came to his application, he addressed
himself to the audience in such a tender, earnest and moving
manner, exciting us to come and become acquainted with the dear
Redeemer, as melted the assembly into tears.”11
On Saturday, Dr. Sewall and his associate, Rev. Prince,
arranged for Whitefield to speak at Old South Church. The message
emphasized the Reformation teaching of justification by faith and
the necessity of regeneration by the Holy Spirit. He spoke “with a
mighty sense of God, eternity, the immortality and preciousness of
the souls of his hearers, of their original corruption, and of the
extreme danger the unregenerate are in.”12 His message was well received,
and the pastors were charitable about the youthful preacher’s
occasional slips. In the afternoon he spoke to 5,000 people on the
Common.13
At the First Church of Boston, the senior pastor, Rev. Thomas
Foxcroft, was sympathetic to Whitefield’s efforts to kindle the
flames of revival. He gave a supportive sermon occasioned by
Whitefield’s visit and ministry (published in 1740), and in 1745
wrote an “Apology” defending his right to a fair hearing.14 On the other hand, Foxcroft’s
colleague, pastor Charles Chauncy, was a strong opponent of the
revival and its accompanying “enthusiasm.” Although the pastors
had their differences, Whitefield was invited to come over after
attending the Sunday morning service at Brattle Street Church and
preach at the First Church in the afternoon. His message had “a
great and visible effect”15 on the large audience. Apparently
many more people were eager to hear him because immediately
following this he went over to the Boston Common and preached to a
huge crowd of 12,000 to 15,000 people.16
When Whitefield spoke in the Boston churches, they were often
crowded with people squeezed into the pews, standing in the
aisles, filling the pulpit area and stairways, and stretching to
look in the windows. On at least one occasion the crowd was so
packed that he had to enter the Old South church through a
window.17 After preaching at Rev. Webb’s
New North Church on the morning of Monday, September 22, he went
to speak at the Rev. Checkley’s New South Church. That church was
so overcrowded that when people heard the sound of a cracking
board they were thrown into a panic, thinking the galleries were
falling.18 People jumped from the galleries
onto the people below, threw themselves out of the windows, and
trampled people trying to get outside. Within a couple of days,
five people died as a result of the panic. Whitefield arrived in
the midst of the chaos and had the presence of mind to calm the
stampede and announce that he would preach on the Boston Common
instead. Even though the weather was wet that day, many thousands
followed Whitefield for his outdoor sermon.
The following day Whitefield went to Roxbury to visit Rev.
Walter, who had succeeded Rev. John Eliot, Apostle to the Indians,
as pastor of the First Church of Roxbury. Later in the day he
returned to Boston and preached at both the Second Church and Old
South Church. As usual he also exhorted and ministered in the
evening to a crowd gathered around the house where he was
lodging.
On Wednesday he went over to Cambridge and spoke twice at
Harvard Yard to a large audience of students, teachers, and a
great number of ministers from neighboring areas. Whitefield said,
“In the afternoon I preached again in the College Yard with
particular application to students. I believe there were seven
thousand hearers. The Holy Spirit melted many hearts.”19 He had an opportunity to meet the
lieutenant governor, Spencer Phipps; the local minister, Rev.
Appleton; and the president of Harvard, Mr. Holyoke. The latter
observed that religion had been “too much in show and profession
only” and lacking in power at Harvard. President Holyoke commended
the work of Whitefield and, later, Gilbert Tennent:
Indeed, these two pious and valuable men of God, who have been
labouring more abundantly among us, have been greatly
instrumental, in the hands of God, to revive this blessed work;
and many, no doubt have been savingly converted from the error of
their ways, many more have been convicted, and all have been in
some measure roused from their lethargy.20
Thus the College, which had been founded one hundred years
earlier to train clergy for the churches, received a new infusion
of spiritual life. Dr. Colman wrote, “At Cambridge the college is
a new creature; the students full of God.”21 The Harvard visiting committee of
the overseers reported in June 1741 that “they find of late
extraordinary and happy impressions of a religious nature have
been made on the minds of a great number of students.”22
On Thursday, Whitefield spoke at the weekly lecture at the
First Church taking Dr. Sewall’s place. He then had dinner at the
governor’s home, along with most of the pastors. At the governor’s
request Whitefield prayed for all the ministers. After ministering
privately to the governor, he took the ferry over to Charlestown
where he preached in the afternoon. The next day he preached in
Roxbury where Rev. Walter was pastor. This elderly minister
commended his preaching saying it was “Puritanism revived.” Later
in the day Whitefield returned to Boston and spoke from a scaffold
raised up outside the Hollis Street Church of Rev. Mather Byles.
On Saturday he preached in the morning at the New Brick Church
pastored by Rev. Welsteed. In the afternoon, Whitefield again
preached on the Boston Common to a huge audience of 15,000. Both
sermons apparently had a powerful effect.23 Rev. Thomas Prince of Old South
Church described his sermon on the story of Zaccheus the next
morning, saying he preached “to a very crowded auditory, with
almost as much power and visible appearance of God among us as
yesterday afternoon.”24 Although he was very ill in the
afternoon, he was able to preach at the Brattle Street Church,
where “Dr. Colman said it was the pleasantest time he had ever
enjoyed in that meeting house through the whole course of his
life.”25 In both services Whitefield took
up a collection for his Bethesda Orphanage in Georgia, and the
total received was over 1,000 pounds (Massachusetts currency).
Then he went and preached to a large group of African Americans at
their request. He spoke on the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch
and had a great impact. When he returned to his lodging place, he
found a large crowd waiting for him, and so he gave another
message of exhortation. He wrote in his journal that he was
exhausted and thought his legs would give out from under him, but
the Lord gave him strength and he went to bed refreshed.
Early the next morning, Monday, September 29, he left Boston
and traveled up the New England coast speaking at Marblehead,
Salem, Ipswich, Newbury, Hampton, Portsmouth, and York during the
week. The following Tuesday, October 7, he was back in Boston
preaching morning and evening services at Dr. Colman’s church.
During that week many people under conviction and spiritual
distress sought to meet with him.
On Wednesday he spoke at the New North Church where he noted in
his journal, “Many hearts were melted down. I think I never was so
drawn out to pray for little children, and invite little children
to Jesus Christ, as I was this morning.”26 The next day he decided to speak
on Nicodemus, since there were many ministers present at the
public lecture at Old South Church. This is the occasion of his
famous words, “For I am verily persuaded the generality of
preachers talk of an unknown and unfelt Christ; and the reason why
congregations have been so dead is, because they have had dead men
preaching to them.”27 In the afternoon he spoke to a
vast audience on the Boston Common. On Friday he spoke in
Charlestown and Reading, and on Saturday he preached on Noah from
the meetinghouse steps in Cambridge to a great crowd standing in
the rain.
On Sunday, October 12, his final day in Boston, George
Whitefield preached to an estimated 23,000 on the Boston Common at
his farewell sermon.28 This was probably the largest
gathering of people in North America up to that time. It was more
than the entire population of Boston (which was 17,000 in 1740).
Whitefield described the gathering, “a sight, perhaps never before
seen in America. It being nearly dusk before I had done, the sight
was more solemn. Numbers, great numbers, melted into tears when I
talked of leaving them.”29
On Monday morning, Whitefield left Boston and continued his New
England tour westward through Massachusetts. “In a whirlwind
forty-five day tour of central places in Massachusetts and
Connecticut, Whitefield delivered over 175 sermons to thousands of
hearers that included virtually every New England inhabitant.”30 By that Friday he reached
Northampton, where he was able to spend the weekend with Rev.
Jonathan Edwards and speak several times in his church, the site
of the 1734-35 revival.
Jonathan Edwards wrote of Whitefield’s visit to his church,
“The congregation was extraordinarily melted by each sermon,
almost the whole assembly being in tears for a great part of the
time.”31 His wife, Sarah Edwards,
described him in a letter.
It is wonderful to see what a spell he casts over an audience
by proclaiming the simplest truths of the Bible. I have seen
upwards of a thousand people hang on his words with breathless
silence, broken only by an occasional half-suppressed sob…. A
prejudiced person, I know, might say that this is all theatrical
artifice and display; but not so will anyone think who has seen
and known him. He is a very devout and godly man, and his only aim
seems to be to reach and influence men the best way. He speaks
from a heart aglow with love, and pours out a torrent of eloquence
which is almost irresistible.32
Gilbert Tennent, a Presbyterian leader from New Jersey, came to
Boston in December, 1740 to continue the Awakening at the request
of Whitefield. He stayed through the cold winter months until
March, 1741.
Results of the revival included an increased reading of
religious books, increased demand for church meetings, home
meetings, widespread demand for pastoral counsel, increased church
membership, and a renewal among the pastors themselves. The
churches had to add new weeknight meetings for teaching because
there was such a demand for religious instruction. Small groups
also sprang up in a great many private homes. These private
societies for religious exercises increased to a greater number
than ever before, until there were thirty groups. “The people were
constantly employing the ministers to pray and preach at these
societies, as also at many private houses where no formed society
met; and such numbers flocked to hear us as greatly crowded them
as well as more than usually filled our Houses of public worship
both on Lord’s day and Lectures…”33 Rev. Prince stated, “The Rev.
Cooper was wont to say, that more came to him in one week in deep
concern for their souls, than in the whole twenty-four years of
his preceding ministry. I can also say the same as to the numbers
who repaired to me. Mr. Cooper had about 600 persons in three
months; and Mr. Webb has had in the same space above a
thousand.”34 These and other visible signs
showed that the city had been transformed by the Awakening.
Chart of Boston Churches and Pastors Related to the
1740 Visit of Whitefield
|
Church |
Pastor |
|
First Church |
Rev. Thomas Foxcroft; Rev. Charles Chauncey
(opponent) |
|
Second Church |
Rev. Gee; Rev. Samuel Mather |
|
Old South Church |
Rev. Joseph Sewall; Rev. Thomas Prince |
|
Brattle Street Church |
Dr. Benjamin Colman; Rev. William Cooper |
|
First Baptist |
Rev. Jeremiah Condy |
|
West Church |
Rev. Hooper |
|
Hollis Street Church |
Rev. Mather Byles |
|
Christ Church |
Dr. Cutler (opponent) |
|
Trinity Church |
Rev. Addington Davenport (1740) |
|
King’s Chapel |
Rev. Price |
|
New North Church |
Rev. Webb |
|
New South Church |
Rev. Samuel Checkley |
|
New Brick Church |
Rev. Welsteed; Rev. Gray |
|
First Church of Roxbury |
Rev. Walter |
|
First Church of Cambridge |
Rev. Appleton |
This article continues here.
Footnotes for this section:
1 W. G. Travis, “Revivalism,
Protestant,” Dictionary of Christianity in America, ed.
Daniel G. Reid (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1990),
1012.
2 Hamilton Hill, History of the Old
South Church, vol. 1 (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company,
1890), 1:503.
3 Mark A. Noll, The Rise of
Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, Whitefield, and the
Wesleys (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2003),
79.
4 Jonathan Edwards, A Faithful
Narrative of the Surprising Work of God… 3rd edition (Boston:
S. Kneeland, T. Green, 1738). Shorter preface by the Boston
ministers signed by Joseph Sewall, Thomas Prince, John Webb, and
William Cooper.
5 Mark A. Noll, 91.
6Arnold A. Dallimore, George
Whitefield: The Life and Times of the Great Evangelist of the
Eighteenth-Century Revival, vol.1 (Westchester, Ill.:
Cornerstone Books, 1970), 1:527.
7 Edward S. Ninde, quoted in
Dallimore, 1:412.
8 Frank Lambert, “Pedlar in
Divinity”: George Whitefield and the Transatlantic Revivals
(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994), 123.
9 Ibid., 128.
10Ibid., 127.
11 Hill, 1:506.
12 Hill, 1:506 (Quoting Rev. Thomas
Prince’s account).
13 Edwin Scott Gaustad, The Great
Awakening in New England (New York: Harper & Brothers,
1957), 26. Quoting The Boston Weekly News-Letter, 25
Sept. 1740.
14 Arthur B. Ellis, History of the
First Church in Boston, 1630-1880 (Boston: Hall and Whiting,
1881), 182, 202.
15 Hill, 1:506.
16 Ibid.
17 Dallimore, 1:533.
18 This had actually happened in
Jonathan Edwards’s church, and he had written up the account of
how God had miraculously preserved the congregation from death and
serious injury.
19 Hill, 1:508 (quoting Whitefield’s
Journals).
20 Ibid., 1:508 footnote.
21 Hill, 1:510 footnote.
22 Justin Winsor, editor, The
Memorial History of Boston, 4 vols. (Boston: Ticknor and
Company., 1881), 1:234.
23 Dallimore, 1:531; Hill, 1:508.
24 Hill, 1:508.
25 Ibid., 1:509.
26 Dallimore, 1:532.
27 Hill, 1:509 (quoting Whitefield’s
Journals).
28 Mark A. Noll, 105. (Citing Peter
Timothy’s crowd estimate. Whitefield estimated 20,000).
29 Hill, 1: 534.
30 Harry S. Stout, “Whitefield,
George,” Dictionary of Christianity in America, ed.
Daniel G. Reid (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1990),
1252.
31Dallimore, 1:538.
32 Ibid., 1:539.
33 Hill, 1:519
34 Dallimore,
1:536-537.